More on Kanji

Let me address the use of kanji Vs. phonetic alphabets again. Kanji uses a symbol to represent a single idea, object, etc. Phonetic alphabets represent sound only. So let's make some comparisons:

Symbols Required: Phonetic alphabets are the clear winner here if you think less is more. Kanji has around 2000 characters in common use and Chinese even more.

Language Specificity: You might think that phonetic alphabets are the winner here too but not so quick please. While it is possible to write Japanese in the Roman alphabet, you would have no idea what you are reading unless you know Japanese. If you know Kanji, you would also be able to read Chinese to a fair degree also without knowing any Chinese at all.

Ease in Learning: I think this is a no-brainer. Phonetic alphabets are quicker to learn because of the fewer number of symbols.

Speed in Reading: The jury is out on this for me. Intuitively to a Western mind the phonetic alphabet would be quicker to process. This seems wildly counter intuitive to anyone brought up on Kanji. They believe the symbol is processed immediately and can be linked together in a speed reading style. Also, consider this: The Arabic numbers (1, 2, 3, 4, etc.) are basically symbols representing the idea of numbers (e.g. one, two, three, four, etc.). Which of the following is easier to process:

• 14,597.6
• Fourteen thousand, five hundred and ninety seven point six

Note also in the above example that with Arabic numbers it is readable in any language while in the second example it makes sense only in English.

I dunno, but I am getting too old to learn a couple of thousand new characters to represent my feeble thoughts...

V = 6015